Mandating the who is matt smith dating
In West Virginia, a predictable annual tradition occurs as the legislature wraps up its session: the state trauma providers receive an e-mail from the their state representatives and senators asking that we weigh in on whether to continue or repeal the state’s mandatory helmet law.
As medical professionals, surgeons need to play a role in public policy decisions that relate to health care, including the debate over helmet laws.
In 2002, a Consortium of the American Board of Internal Medicine, The American College of Physicians, and The American Society of Internal Medicine partnered with the European Federation of Internal Medicine and developed a new Charter for Professionalism.
Each decision to repeal a helmet law sparks political, legal, medical, and ethical debate.
This article examines the data regarding the effectiveness of mandatory motorcycle helmet laws and looks at the legal and ethical concerns surrounding them.
In Sarah Bishop’s argumentative essay, “Mandating the HPV Vaccine,” she offers the newest of debates in the long-standing discussion of teens and sex— the HPV vaccine.
She chooses to approach her audience with a direct argument: “The HPV vaccine should be mandated [for] young teens everywhere.” Her use of ethos, pathos, and logos illustrates and develops her claims about the vaccine.
To set up and then support a good argument a writer should also account for opposition.
Bishop identifies her opposition as “conservative families” who might be opposed to mandating the HPV Vaccine.